disagree. it's not going to be the same performance.
SPECint_rate2006/core says it all. see the slide here
![SHIFT-CLICK=show full size, CTRL-CLICK=restore initial size]()
and
SPECint_rate2006/core comparison here (higher the better)
the Oracle slide used the "baseline" number.. where I usually use the "result" (in csv) which is equivalent to the "peak" column in the
SPECint_rate2006 main page
so the 2830 is a baseline number divide by # of cores which is 64
![]()
and that rules out storage.
on E7 comparison (x3-8)
well yeah they're about the same performance range
$ cat spec.txt | grep -i intel | grep 8870 | sort -rnk1
27, 40, 4, 10, 2, 1010, 1080, Unisys Corporation, Unisys ES7000 Model 7600R G3 (Intel Xeon E7-8870)
26.75, 40, 4, 10, 2, 1010, 1070, NEC Corporation, Express5800/A1080a-S (Intel Xeon E7-8870)
26.75, 40, 4, 10, 2, 1010, 1070, NEC Corporation, Express5800/A1080a-D (Intel Xeon E7-8870)
26.5, 40, 4, 10, 2, 1000, 1060, Oracle Corporation, Sun Server X2-8 (Intel Xeon E7-8870 2.40 GHz)
25.875, 80, 8, 10, 2, 1960, 2070, Supermicro, SuperServer 5086B-TRF (X8OBN-F Intel E7-8870)
24.875, 80, 8, 10, 2, 1890, 1990, Oracle Corporation, Sun Server X2-8 (Intel Xeon E7-8870 2.40 GHz)
on E5 comparison (x3-2)
x3-2 is still way faster than t5-8 ;) 44 vs 29
SPECint_rate2006/core.. oh yeah, faster.
$ cat spec.txt | grep -i intel | grep -i "E5-26" | grep -i sun | sort -rnk1
44.0625, 16, 2, 8, 2, 632, 705, Oracle Corporation, Sun Blade X6270 M3 (Intel Xeon E5-2690 2.9GHz)
44.0625, 16, 2, 8, 2, 632, 705, Oracle Corporation, Sun Blade X3-2B (Intel Xeon E5-2690 2.9GHz)
44.0625, 16, 2, 8, 2, 630, 705, Oracle Corporation, Sun Server X3-2L (Intel Xeon E5-2690 2.9GHz)
44.0625, 16, 2, 8, 2, 630, 705, Oracle Corporation, Sun Fire X4270 M3 (Intel Xeon E5-2690 2.9GHz)
43.875, 16, 2, 8, 2, 628, 702, Oracle Corporation, Sun Server X3-2 (Intel Xeon E5-2690 2.9GHz)
43.875, 16, 2, 8, 2, 628, 702, Oracle Corporation, Sun Fire X4170 M3 (Intel Xeon E5-2690 2.9GHz)